Accurate localization of impacted third molars is critical for surgical planning. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) compared to panoramic radiography in detecting impaction patterns. Fifty patients with clinically suspected third molar impaction underwent both imaging modalities. CBCT provided three-dimensional visualization and precise assessment of root proximity to the mandibular canal, while panoramic radiographs underestimated positional relationships in 32% of cases. CBCT proved superior in identifying complex impactions, potentially reducing surgical complications.

Keywords:
CBCT, Panoramic Radiography, Impacted Third Molars, Oral Radiology, Diagnostic Accuracy